Minutes of Faculty Council Meeting 12/7/99

 

Announcements:

The APC will no longer be working with the honor code; instead they will focus on revising the code of conduct for next year.  APC will suggest that the Leadership Council appoint an ad hoc committee to work on an honor code.

 

A picture of the whole community will be taken at 12 on Friday, December 10.

The computer learning lab in the library may not be ready for classes at the start of the second semester.  Although the wiring and physical change will be completed, the tables will be shipped too late for the computers to be installed.  The lab will be available in January and orientation sessions will be held.

If you would like to participate in Martin Luther King Day celebration contact Peggy Craft or Russell Robinson.

 

Discussion: Sally Adkin

Sally Adkin and others will administer an evaluation of the after 8 rule that was put into place at the beginning of the 1999-2000 school year.  She has hired an outside consultant to do a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of this rule.  Focus groups of 10 people from the different constituencies in the school will answer the questions of how the rule has worked and how various groups on campus have been affected.  Sally asked the faculty if there are other important questions, besides those on her list, that would be important for the faculty group to consider. Faculty suggested that the groups be involved in selecting items for discussion.  Faculty members also asked if it wouldn’t be better to include people from all groups from the school together in groups (to which Sally responded no) and if all groups should be asked the same questions. This is a pilot program and the final results of the study will be wrapped up in March.  This will not be a vote by the faculty but rather an informational study that will determine where people are in order to decide on the need for a change in policy.  Faculty should let Dot know if they are interested in serving on one of the focus groups.

 

Updates from Phil:

Dr. Gerry Boarman made a good presentation to the board, and Dr. Boarman also   acknowledged his enthusiasm for working on all of the things we need, particularly in regard to the physical plant.  Twenty-four board members came to the Board retreat and for the first time, they were challenged to help raise money for the school.  The Strategic Plan was shared in draft form with the trustees, and they have been asked to make their suggestions.

By the end of January, the final draft will be in place.

We will have a capital campaign to address faculty needs, the physical plant, sabbaticals in the endowment and other items.  Phil has told the BOT he thinks this school should have $25 million raised in 5 years.  The Trustees have political influence, and we can all work toward more fund raising for the school. None of our budgets will be cut this year; however, unallocated money is unsure due to the budget changes as a result of hurricane Floyd.

 

Approval of Minutes

The faculty approved the minutes of the 11/16 metting.

 

 

ATC Committee report:

Jonathan Keohane reported back on the work of the ATC and the concerns about the T drive. The committee suggests that the faculty need to clean up their T drive folders.  That may involve moving things over to the S drive to appropriate discipline folders.  Each discipline should have folders organized and files should be cleaned up by the end of the semester.  ITS is working on giving students the ability to access their M drives from the EFC through the academic server in the lab there. The ATC now is planning to come up with a global plan for what the school needs, and they would like members of the faculty to tell members of the committee what we should think about in terms of technology.

 

Discussion:

Gail Hudson - Stress Days

There is no such thing as stress days.  If a student comes to the counseling office with serious problems that make them unable to go to class, then students are excused.  If this happens, they are not allowed to participate in evening events.  Students may come late to class because the counselors are assessing this.  Only serious problems will be excused, and the counselors follow up to see that the students are in their rooms if excused. 

 

Discipline hearings

Should faculty know about discipline hearings in advance? The charges may not be valid.  Will this change the faculty member’s perception of the student unfairly?  Many students prefer that their teachers not be told.  Many faculty commented that they should know in advance of hearings because it may help students if adults on campus know about the difficult time a student may be having.  Marlene Blakeney suggested that it is better if students know that everyone has been informed so that the SLI’s will not carry the burden of being the only adults who know about a student’s behavior.   If we are told in advance, we should also know if the charge was valid or not later. The question was also raised about whether faculty should also be told about the nature of all the hearings taking place on campus without the names being listed so that they are aware of what is taking place in the residential environment.